acebloke
Banned user
Reg: 03-2003
Loc: Wiltshire
Posts: 3161
Greatness: 85 (+137/-52)
|
|
|
Re: Bush or Kerry
I almost want america to go and make a war against a whole country, just to prove that other countries would in fact back against america, and therefor kick its ass out of said country.
They've played it safe in Afganistan and Iraq, going against terrorism, which is why the above hasnt happened yet. As I've probably said before these two wars differ from their usual Communist bashing, it seems they've moved on to people they have supplied weapons to in the past.
Again, I've probably said this before, but the reason there was no biological or nuclear weapons in Iraq is because they cant afford to develop it themselfs, and America never supplied them any.
Last edited by acebloke, 21/Aug/04, 1:29 am
--- Freedom to Lebanon, Liberation from Israel, Stop the occupation and killing of civilians.
|
21/Aug/04, 1:28 am
|
|
Ixions Wheel
Reg: 08-2004
Posts: 362
Greatness: 14 (+15/-1)
|
|
|
Re: Bush or Kerry
quote:
Again, I've probably said this before, but the reason there was no biological or nuclear weapons in Iraq is because they cant afford to develop it themselfs, and America never supplied them any.
By Acebloke.
Ermm dude, this isn't quite true.
America supplied the majority of their weapons years ago when it was in their intrest to do so, in the ongoing war against the Russians.
The terrorist piloting the 9/11 plane was trained in America, given his piloting licence and general army training along with a large contingent of the current terrorists.
The weapons they are using to fight with may not be biological/nuclear (even though over 60% of the world's countries can afford nuclear weaponry) but the Yanks definitely supplied them.
Why people believed Bush and Blair is beyond me as they are just repeating the excuses our countries plyed us with during the Gulf War, pretending that it really isn't just about oil, which is BS as back then the only reason England intervened was for that very reason. Why should anything have changed in these past decades?
Back to the thread's point, Bush is a cretin, a faineant puppet in an internal power struggle trying to dominate with his archaic Redneck philosophies.
I know very little about Kerry except what they would like us to know. The fact that America looks upon the governing of their country like a Rhetoric quizshow, the winner being able the talk the most !@#$ for the longest time whilst sounding like they know something.
Has anyone else seen/heard the latest slant against his 'esteemed military career' by his ex-Naval 'buddies'? More stageshow antics.
"I'm John Kerry, reporting for duty."(salutes) - talk about playing a gimmick!
Arnold Schwarzenegger....need I say more...
|
31/Aug/04, 1:49 pm
|
|
masterblaster666
Reg: 11-2005
Posts: 4
Greatness: -1 (+0/-1)
|
|
|
Re: Bush or Kerry
I prefer Kerry but I still think Bill Clinton was the best President of the USA. I hope Hilary Clinton is out next President.
|
9/Nov/05, 12:07 pm
|
|