Grenseal
Ultima Weapon
Reg: 11-2003
Loc: Port City Baltimore
Posts: 1111
Greatness: 66 (+81/-15)
|
|
|
Re: 9/11 hoax
Oh don't worry I didn't forget, i merely got sidetracked the past few days with some weird virus. I watched a brief part of that section tonight and here is what I think so far:
1.) The author shows a quote and explains that some air traffic controllers thought the flight they were tracking was a military plane. Sadly the author doesn't show you the whole quote as he tries to quote mine it. To finish the quote you would add the line
"The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane," O'Brien said. "You don't fly a 757 in that manner. It's unsafe."
Now if you read this whole quote you can see why it doesn't prove much of anything. The air traffic controller never said "it wasn't a 757", simply that you typically don't fly a 757 in that manner. I wonder how much a hijacker would care for the safety of the passengers?
2.) The author says the plane slid along the ground into the pentagon
There's also plenty of eyewitness accounts that claim the plane crashed into the building itself. Perhaps it depends on what angle you viewed the crash from.
3.) Why is there no plane debris outside or large chunks of the aircraft
Well for one the plane did crash into the pentagon which started a large fire. Large crashes and explosions tend to destroy the object that crashed so it comes as no surprise to me that something like this wouldn't leave large pieces of the plane laying around. This has also happened in other airplane crashes. If you've ever seen pictures of a similar crash then you'd realize that.
Also given that the plane did penetrate into the structure I wouldn't think there would be too much on the front lawn.
This is pretty much the same deal as when I first started watching this thing. Right off the bat the author makes some pretty wild assumptions, and fails to use even simple logic to determine what really happened. I'll watch the rest of it over the weekend but I don't expect it to be any more "scientific". I can't believe someone actually used that word to describe this. People should really find out what science actually is. Rather than immediately believing what this guy is saying try critically thinking about the situation and what he is trying to tell you. It doesn't take much thought to realize that his so called evidence can barely hold water.
--- Icewind Dale II talk
Ulbrec: ...Ennelia and Braston will meet you there, Targos's fate hinges on your success.
My response: I think Targos's fate hinges on how much Shawford can pay us from the Targos treasury.
|
23/Mar/06, 5:12 am
|
|